Legal Opinion

Wallace v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided February 23, 1939No. C. D. 108PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McClelland, Presiding Judge:

This protest is directed against the refusal of the collector of customs at the port of New York to allow drawback on the exportation of caustic soda claimed to have been produced with the use of domestic rock salt in quantities equal to quantities of the same material imported by the producer. The section of the Tariff Act of 1930 relied upon by the plaintiffs is section 313 (b), which reads as follows:

SEC. 313. DRAWBACK AND REFUNDS.

ifc * ⅜ ⅝? ⅝ % ⅛!(b) Substitution for Drawback Purposes. — If imported duty-paid sugar or nonferrous metal, or ore containing…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Nix v. HeddenSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  2. Marvel v. MerrittSupreme Court of the United States · 1885

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Nichols Copper Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1941
  2. Union Carbide Int'l Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API