Legal Opinion

MacY's California, Inc. v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 26, 1995No. A071386PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

CHIN, P. J.

Catherine Jenae Tussy-Garber (Tussy-Garber) allegedly pricked her finger on a hypodermic needle in the pocket of a jacket that had been returned to Macy’s California, Inc. (Macy’s), by another customer. Tussy-Garber is now suing Macy’s for negligence, asserting a right to emotional distress damages because she fears contracting acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS) 1 or another serious or lethal disease. Macy’s challenges availability of emotional distress damages for fear of disease where no physical harm has been shown. We conclude that the superior court erred in…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Rowland v. ChristianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Dillon v. LeggCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Crisci v. Security InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Potter v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.California Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Molien v. Kaiser Foundation HospitalsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Malena v. Marriott International, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2002
  2. DeCastro West Chodorow & Burns, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
  3. Hartwig v. OREGON TRIAL EYE CLINICNebraska Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Wooden v. RavelingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
  5. Hindin v. RustCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API