Legal Opinion

Popham v. Duncan

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided February 24, 1930No. 12,468PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Whitford

Charles M. Duncan died intestate. The defendant in error, his third wife, survived him. The plaintiff in error was appointed administrator of his estate. The widow petitioned the court for an order requiring the administrator to pay her the widow’s allowance under the statute. The administrator resisted her petition, and set up an antenuptial contract as a bar to the claim for an allowance. The alleged antenuptial contract is as follows:

“This agreement made and entered into this sixteenth day of December, 1924, between Charles M. Duncan, physician, party of the first part, and Mrs. Hattie E.…

2Cited by12 opinions

  1. Newman v. NewmanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1982
  2. Young v. Colorado National Bank of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1961
  3. In Re Marriage of IngelsColorado Court of Appeals · 1979
  4. Schibi v. SchibiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1949
  5. Matter of Estate of BurgessCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1982

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API