Legal Opinion

Westlake v. Murphy

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided September 25, 1909No. 15,756PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from the district court for Lancaster county: Lincoln Frost, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtBarnes, J.

Action to recover damages for personal injuries alleged to have been 'sustained by reason of the negligence of the defendant. Plaintiff had a verdict and judgment, and the defendant has appealed.

The following facts may be considered established beyond dispute: The defendant was a contractor engaged in the business of constructing brick, concrete and asphalt pavements. In the year 1906 he had a contract with, the city of Lincoln to construct a large amount of pavement on the streets of that city. Plaintiff was employed by the defendant as a common laborer, and at the time of the injury…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Wright v. . New York Central Railroad CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1862
  2. Mad River & Lake Erie Railroad v. BarberOhio Supreme Court · 1856
  3. Adams v. Iron Cliffs Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Justice v. Pennsylvania Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1892
  5. Haviland v. Kansas City, Pittsburg & Gulf RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1903

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Baird-Ward Printing Co. v. FlemingTennessee Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Sellers v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy RailroadNebraska Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Fosler v. AdenNebraska Supreme Court · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API