In the Interest of A. M. B.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1ConcurrenceMcfadden, Judge
I concur fully in the majority opinion. I write separately to express a concern about the implications of the extension in 2008 of the discretionary appeal procedure to terminations of parental rights. Very often — as in this case — such applications come to this court without a transcript of the termination hearing. It is my understanding that some juvenile courts provide transcripts to indigent applicants only after an application for discretionary appeal has been granted. I question the soundness of such a practice.
Until 2008, terminations of parental rights were subject to the direct…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- M. L. B. v. S. L. J.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Nix v. Department of Human ResourcesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1976
- Harper v. HarperSupreme Court of Georgia · 1989
- In the Interest of A. C.Supreme Court of Georgia · 2009
- In the Interest of B. C. P.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.