Legal Opinion · Concurrence

In the Interest of A. M. B.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided October 30, 2013No. A13A1168Published

1ConcurrenceMcfadden, Judge

I concur fully in the majority opinion. I write separately to express a concern about the implications of the extension in 2008 of the discretionary appeal procedure to terminations of parental rights. Very often — as in this case — such applications come to this court without a transcript of the termination hearing. It is my understanding that some juvenile courts provide transcripts to indigent applicants only after an application for discretionary appeal has been granted. I question the soundness of such a practice.

Until 2008, terminations of parental rights were subject to the direct…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. M. L. B. v. S. L. J.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
  2. Nix v. Department of Human ResourcesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1976
  3. Harper v. HarperSupreme Court of Georgia · 1989
  4. In the Interest of A. C.Supreme Court of Georgia · 2009
  5. In the Interest of B. C. P.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1997

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API