Legal Opinion

Teplitzky v. Lippman

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided March 25, 1932PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Service of the summons by leaving it at the office of the Secretary of State in the city of New York, coupled with compliance by plaintiff with the other provisions of section 52 of the Vehicle and Traffic Law (as amd. by Laws of 1930, chap. 57), sufficed to give the court jurisdiction of the defendants. (Stoibor v. Marinacci, 142 Misc. 345; affd., 235 App. Div. 714.)

Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied.

All concur; present, Lydon, Frankenthaler andUntermyer, JJ.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Stoibor v. MarinacciAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1931
  2. Stoiber v. MarinacciAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1932

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Keller v. American Sales Book Co.District Court, W.D. New York · 1936