Legal Opinion

Allwein v. Sprinkle

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1882No. 10,299Published

From the Huntington Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtWoods, C. J.

Action by the appellant upon an undertaking conditioned as follows: “ WhereasHenry S. Sprinkle, as administrator of the estate of Catharine Shoemaker, deceased, did, upon the 12th day of May, 1881, in the Whitley Circuit Court, recover judgment against David Shoemaker in the sum of five hundred and fifty-six and dollars and costs of suit taxed at seventy-five and y-^ dollars, upon which judg*241merit an execution was duly issued from the clerk’s office of the Whitley Circuit Court, in and for Whitley county, Indiana ; and whereas Franklin P. Allwein, as sheriff, by virtue •of said writ of…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Bond v. WardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1810
  2. Griffiths v. . HardenberghNew York Court of Appeals · 1869
  3. Chamberlain v. . BellerNew York Court of Appeals · 1858
  4. Van Cleef v. FleetNew York Supreme Court · 1818
  5. Benedict v. BrayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1852

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API