Legal Opinion
Ortiz v. Banco Popular de Puerto Rico
District Court, D. Puerto Rico
Decided July 24, 1996No. Civil No. 94-2303 (JAF)PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
FUSTE, District Judge.
I
On October 4, 1994, plaintiffs, Eduardo Melo Ortiz, his wife Celeste Núñez de Melo, and the conjugal partnership formed between them, brought suit against defendant, Banco Popular de Puerto Rico, for damages arising from the bank’s countermand of two cashier’s cheeks that it had issued on October 7, 1993. Docket Document No. 1. Plaintiffs have since filed a motion for judgment on the pleadings pursuant to Rule 12(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Docket Document No. 8. For its part, defendant seeks summary judgment. Docket Document No. 12.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Temple v. Synthes Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Goldman, Antonetti, Ferraiuoli, Axtmayer & Hertell, a Partnership v. Medfit International, Inc., Hector RodriguezCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
- Dionisio Sainz Gonzalez v. Banco De Santander-Puerto Rico, Dionisio Sainz Gonzalez v. Banco De Santander-Puerto RicoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
- Hanover Insurance Company v. Liberian Oceanway Corp.District Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1975
- Lacombe v. Manpower, Inc.District Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1986
3Cited by2 opinions
- TMTV, CORP. v. Mass Productions, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2011
- Halebian v. BervCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009