Legal Opinion

Ostrom v. City of San Antonio

Texas Supreme Court

Decided May 20, 1890No. 6522PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from Bexar. Tried below before Hon. G. H. Noonan.

1Opinion of the Court

ACKER, Presiding Judge.

—Appellant brought this suit to restrain the City of San Antonio from opening a road across her enclosed lots 12 and 13. It was alleged in the petition that the defendant by its officers had entered upon plaintiff’s property and attempted to establish a highway over it not in the manner required by law and in violation of her rights, because there had never been a legally established road over the lots, and because she had held lot 12 under fence and enclosed for more than ten years, and had held lot 13 so enclosed for more than three years prior to the defendant’s…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. City of San Antonio v. RowleyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1908
  2. Gulf, C. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. CandlerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931
  3. Williamson v. WorkCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1903
  4. Texas & P. Ry. Co. v. BelcherCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1920
  5. Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion, Texas Attorney General Reports1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API