Legal Opinion

Satre v. Ralph

Vermont Superior Court

Decided November 24, 2020Published

1Opinion of the Court

STATE OF VERMONT SUPERIOR COURT a CIVIL DIVISION Washington Unit /Jx Docket No. 264-7-20 Wncv Wayne Satre, Plaintiff v. DECISION ON MOTION Lindsay Ralph, Defendant Wayne Satre’s Motion for Writ of Replevin In this case, Plaintiff Wayne Satre, the father of Dylan Satre and now the administrator of Dylan’s estate, has sought the return of Dylan’s dog, Kush, from his girlfriend, Defendant Lindsay Ralph, with whom both Dylan and Kush lived prior to Dylan’s death.1 Ms. Ralph has refused to voluntarily give up possession of Kush. Wayne now seeks replevin (return of the dog) on a preliminary basis…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Goodby v. Vetpharm, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2009
  2. Scheele v. DustinSupreme Court of Vermont · 2010
  3. Eddy v. DavisSupreme Court of Vermont · 1862

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API