Legal Opinion
Pennwalt Corp. v. Plough, Inc.
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided December 5, 1979No. Civ. A. No. 79-226PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MURRAY M. SCHWARTZ, District Judge.
This case involves a complaint and a substantially identical counterclaim in which the plaintiff Pennwalt Corporation (“Penn-walt”), manufacturer of DESENEX, and the defendant Plough, Inc. (“Plough”), manufacturer of AFTATE, charge each other with false, misleading and deceptive advertising of their respective athlete’s foot remedies. This conduct allegedly constitutes a violation of section 43(a) of the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1125(a), as well as violations of pendent state law claims.
The Court is presented with a variety of disputes relating to…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- L'Aiglon Apparel, Inc. v. Lana Lobell, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1954
- Alfred Dunhill Limited and Alfred Dunhill of London, Inc. v. Interstate Cigar Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
- Colligan v. Activities Club of New York, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Parkway Baking Co. v. Freihofer Baking Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1958
- Colligan v. Activities Club of New York, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1971
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- United Nuclear Corp. v. General Atomic Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1980
- Gerling International Insurance Co. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue. Appeal of Gerling International Insurance CoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
- Coca-Cola Bottling Co. of Shreveport, Inc. v. Coca-Cola Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1985
- Wayne R. La Mura v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985
- Schutt Manufacturing Co. v. Riddell, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.