Legal Opinion

Fellows v. Smith

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided September 29, 1881PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMorton, J.

This is a trustee process. The Northampton Street Railway Company was summoned as trustee. It appears by the trustee’s answers that the principal defendant is in the service of the trustee as a conductor; that at the time of the service of the writ the wages earned by him amounted to $6.75; that he owed the trustee $4.57 for money received by him from the sale of tickets; and that he had in his possession tickets to the value of five dollars entrusted to him to sell. By the contract between the parties, the conductor was to account for the tickets entrusted to him in the settlement for his…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Jordan v. LavinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946
  2. Yeiichi Miyashiro v. YapHawaii Supreme Court · 1923
  3. de Souza v. SmithHawaii Supreme Court · 1897

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API