Legal Opinion
Winkelmann v. Calvert
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Decided March 4, 1946No. Patent Appeal No. 5084PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
O’CONNELL, Associate Judge.
This appeal by Winkelmann from the decision of the Board of Interference Examiners of the United States Patent Office awarding priority of invention to Calvert involves not only the same parties but also *1013the same general subject matter as Interference No. 74,296 previously involved and litigated to a final decision here in Calvert v. Winkelmann, 129 F.2d 536, 29 C.C.P.A., Patents, 1200.
More specifically, this interference was declared for the purpose of determining the question of priority of invention between Winkclmann’s patent No. 2,115,055, granted April 26,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Southern Pacific Railroad v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Roberts v. Northern Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- In re Retail Clerks International Protective Ass'nCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1945
- Winkelmann v. CalvertCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1942
3Cited by8 opinions
- Crane Boom Life Guard Co., Inc. v. Saf-T-Boom CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1966
- Stoudt v. GuggenheimCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1981
- Alumatone Corp. v. Vita-Var Corp.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1950
- Alumatone Corporation v. Vitavar CorporationCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1950
- Alumatone Corporation v. Vitavar CorporationCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1950
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.