Legal Opinion

Kij v. Aszkler

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 18, 1937PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHinkley, J.

This is a motion to dismiss the complaint in the above-entitled action upon the ground that it does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action.

For the purpose of this motion all allegations of fact contained in the complaint are conceded. The only questions presented to the court are whether power exists in the common council to sell the corporate real estate and whether section 23 of the General City Law (known as the Home Rule Law), which prescribes a method of sale, is controlling.

The charter of the city of Lackawanna was enacted by chapter 574 of the Laws of 1909. By that…

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. Jewett v. Luau-Nyack Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1972
  2. Merritt Manor Estates, Inc. v. Village of ElmsfordNew York Supreme Court · 1961
  3. In re the Assessment of the Cost of the Improvement of Edgewood AvenueNew York Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Town of Poestenkill v. SichoNew York Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Goldberg v. Board of Examiners of Board of EducationNew York Supreme Court · 1965

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API