Legal Opinion

Keith v. Van Hoy, Inc.

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided October 25, 1995No. 47A04-9504-CV-139PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DARDEN, Judge.

STATEMENT OF THE CASE

Roger and Theresa Keith appeal the trial court's grant of summary judgment in favor of Van Hoy, Inc. We affirm.

ISSUE

Whether the trial court erred in granting Van Hoy's summary judgment motion.

FACTS

Foameraft, Inc., in Mitchell, Indiana, manufactures foam products. A erusher is a machine which crushes foam materials to make them softer. A crusher is similar to an "old wringer on an old washing machine." Keith's Brief, p. 8. The erusher has two rollers, and the crusher only runs one way. Thus, if material needs to be crushed several times, operators have…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hermann v. YaterIndiana Court of Appeals · 1994
  2. Citizens Gas & Coke Utility v. American Economy Insurance Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Snider v. Bob Heinlin Concrete Construction Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1987
  4. National Steel Erection v. HinkleIndiana Court of Appeals · 1989
  5. Lynn v. HartIndiana Court of Appeals · 1991

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Blake v. Calumet Construction Corp.Indiana Supreme Court · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API