Commercial Casualty Insurance v. United States
United States Court of Claims
1Opinion of the CourtWhaley, Judge
This case does not involve a question of fact. The only question presented for decision is the construction of Article 9 of the contract with the original contractor.
It appears that on September 27, 1929, the Murphy Plumbing Company entered into a written contract with the defendant to install certain plumbing in the United States Veterans’ Hospital, North Chicago, Illinois, for the total consideration of $72,677.33. The Murphy Plumbing Company, as principal, and the plaintiff, as surety, executed a performance bond in favor of the United States for the faithful performance of the contract.…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Fidelity & Casualty Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1935
3Cited by8 opinions
- United States v. CunninghamCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1941
- National Surety Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1944
- American Surety Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1943
- Avey v. Leather Products Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1942
- Fireman's Fund Indemnity Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1941
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.