Legal Opinion
Young v. Klutznick
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided September 25, 1980No. Civ. A. 80-71330PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GILMORE, District Judge.
Can a headcount of the persons in the United States, made on the 1st of April, 1980, and unadjusted for an acknowledged undercount, be used for the reapportionment of the United States House of Representatives, and the distribution of Federal funds among states and sub-state units of government? That is the question in this case. The answer is clearly no.
Since 1790, with the exception of 1970 when nearly five million people were imputed and added to the headcount, the population of the United States, and its various governmental units has been determined by an…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
- Reynolds v. SimsSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Powell v. McCormackSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- United States v. American Trucking AssociationsSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Carey v. KlutznickCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
- United States of America Ex Rel. Bruce Barksdale v. Frank Blackburn, Warden, Louisiana State PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- City of Philadelphia v. KlutznickDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1980
- United States House of Representatives v. United States Department of CommerceDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1998
- City of New York v. United States Department of CommerceDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1990
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.