Legal Opinion

Tomlinson v. Armour & Co.

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided February 25, 1907PublishedCited by 2 opinions

On demurrer to declaration.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Garrison, J.

This is a demurrer to a declaration. Reduced to narrative form, the essential allegations of the declaration are that Armour & Company were engaged in the business of canning and vending ham for food and that it was their duty to put up only wholesome and edible ham, but that in disregard of this duty they negligently put in a certain can diseased ham that was deleterious to health, and sold said can to a retail dealer, of whom the plaintiff purchased it for food, and upon eating a piece of the ham was rendered sick of ptomaine poison.

The…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Wiedeman v. KellerIllinois Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Howard v. EmersonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1872
  3. Race v. Easton & Amboy RailroadSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1898

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of Florida · 1908
  2. Beckham v. Jacobs' Pharmacy Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1920

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API