Legal Opinion
BUNTING v. RK MCKNIGHT ROAD, LLC
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Decided August 21, 2023No. 2:23-cv-00850Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA RANDY BUNTING, Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 2:23-cv-850 v. Hon. William S. Stickman IV RK MCKNIGHT ROAD, LLC and BP PLC, Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION WILLIAM S. STICKMAN IV, United States District Judge Defendant RK McKnight Road, LLC (“RK McKnight’) moves to dismiss Plaintiff Randy Bunting’s (“Bunting”) negligence action pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(7) (“Rule 12(b)(7)”), arguing that Bunting failed to join indispensable parties. (ECF No. 13). Defendant BP PLC (“BP”) joined in RK McKnight’s…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Provident Tradesmens Bank & Trust Co. v. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Temple v. Synthes Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Janney Montgomery Scott, Inc. v. Shepard Niles, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
- General Refractories Co. v. First State InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
- Huber v. TaylorCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.