Baker v. Commonwealth
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court by
Judge Clay
Reversing.
Appellant was indicted for the offense of “owning, harboring, operating and having in his possession an *182illicit or moonshine still. ’ ’ The indictment being duplicitous, he asked that the Commonwealth be required to elect. His motion was sustained, and the Commonwealth elected to try him for the offense of “harboring a moonshine still.” The jury found him guilty and imposed a fine of $300.00, in addition to a jail sentence of 50 days.
The present statute merely makes it unlawful for any person “to buy, bargain, sell, loan, own, have in possession or…
2Cited by2 opinions
- Rader v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1941
- Howard v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1941