Legal Opinion

Baker v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided February 19, 1924PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Clay

Reversing.

Appellant was indicted for the offense of “owning, harboring, operating and having in his possession an *182illicit or moonshine still. ’ ’ The indictment being duplicitous, he asked that the Commonwealth be required to elect. His motion was sustained, and the Commonwealth elected to try him for the offense of “harboring a moonshine still.” The jury found him guilty and imposed a fine of $300.00, in addition to a jail sentence of 50 days.

The present statute merely makes it unlawful for any person “to buy, bargain, sell, loan, own, have in possession or…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Rader v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1941
  2. Howard v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API