Legal Opinion

Yardley v. Clothier

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania

Decided January 5, 1892PublishedCited by 9 opinions

At Law. Motion for judgment on case stated. Assumpsit by Richard Yardley, receiver of the Keystone National Bank, against George W. Clothier, to recover the amount of a note indorsed by said defendant and discounted by said bank.

1Opinion of the Court

Butler, District Judge.

The facts, (presented in a ease stated,) so far as material, are that the plaintiff'is receiver of the Keystone National Bank; that, at the time of its insolvency, it was indebted to the defendant in the sum of $1,127.96; that, at the samo time, it held three notes indorsed by Mm, not then due, aggregating in amount $390; that the notes were not paid by the maker, and were duly protested, of which notice was given; that the plaintiff sues on these notes, and the defendant sets up the indebtedness to him as a defense.

*338The doctrine of set-off is founded on the principles…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. National Bank v. ColbySupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  2. Jordan v. . National Shoe and Leather BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
  3. Merritt v. . SeamanNew York Court of Appeals · 1852
  4. Fry v. EvansNew York Supreme Court · 1832
  5. Skiles v. HoustonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1885

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Ellerbe v. Studebaker Corporation of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1927
  2. Williams v. RoseDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1914
  3. Williams v. JohnsonMontana Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Williams v. BurgessWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1914
  5. Shannon v. SutherlandCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1935

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API