Legal Opinion

Frazer v. Frazer Lubricator Co.

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided May 12, 1887PublishedCited by 20 opinions

Appeal from the Appellate Court for the First District;— •heard in that court on appeal from the Superior Court of Oook county; the Hon. Henry M. Shepard, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Mulkey

The appellee, on the 30th day of August, 1884, exhibited its bill in the Superior Court of Cook county, against the appellants, to enjoin the latter from using the name of “Frazer,” “Samuel Frazer,” “S. Frazer” or “S. Frazer & Co.,” or the tame “Frazer, ” “in any way, in the manufacture of axle grease, according to the process • and of the ingredients used by the appellee in the manufacture of Frazer’s Axle Grease, or of axle grease of any kind whatsoever, ” etc. The court, upon the hearing, rendered a decree in substantial conformity with the prayer of the bill, and the defendants appealed…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Filkins v. BlackmanU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Connecticut · 1876
  2. Probasco v. BouyonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1876

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Hazelton Boiler Co. v. Hazelton Tripod Boiler Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Peck Bros. & Co. v. Peck Bros.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1902
  3. Lothrop Publishing Co. v. Lothrop, Lee & Shepard Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1906
  4. Armington Sims v. PalmerSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1898
  5. Lapointe Machine Tool Co. v. J. N. Lapointe Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1916

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API