Legal Opinion

McMorran v. Murphy

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 19, 1888PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Erior to Wayne. (Jennison, J.) Replevin. Defendant Murphy brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtMorse, J.

This is an action of replevin for certain steam-pumps and other wrecking apparatus.

The property was sold by plaintiffs to defendant Murphy upon a written contract, which provided, among other things, that all the property described in and sold by virtue thereof—

“ Shall be liable, and this agreement shall constitute a lien or mortgage on said property to secure payment of the notes of said second party for amounts above stated, at the times stated; and said first parties are hereby authorized and empowered, in case default is made in payment of said notes, or any of them, when due, to take…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Molsons Bank v. BermanMichigan Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Brydges v. EmmendorferMichigan Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Allen v. HillmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Auch v. Washtenaw County SheriffMichigan Supreme Court · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API