Legal Opinion
Burcham v. Kamoraski
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided May 2, 1962No. Nos. 2652, 2653PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WHITE, Judge.
These are consolidated appeals by Florida National Bank of Jacksonville and Brantley Burcham as co-executors under the last will and testament of Helen D. Lubbe dated August 24, 1959. Brantley Burcham was named sole beneficiary of the decedent’s residuary estate. The appellants challenge a probate order declaring the residuary bequest void on the ground that Brantley Burcham was an interested subscribing witness to the will.
The issues of the case also focus attention on a prior will of Helen D. Lubbe dated August 15, 1958. This will was drafted by Brantley Burcham who was named…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Second Church of Christ, Scientist, of New York City v. KaufmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
- Linkins v. Protestant Episcopal Cathedral Foundation of the District of Columbia Williams v. Protestant Episcopal Cathedral Foundation of the District of Columbia Stone v. Protestant Episcopal Cathedral Foundation of the District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1950
- Stewart v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Florida · 1940
- Trotter v. Van PeltSupreme Court of Florida · 1940
- In Re Estate of PrattSupreme Court of Florida · 1956
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- In Re Lubbe's EstateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1962
- Stewart v. Central of Georgia RailroadDistrict Court, S.D. Georgia · 2000