Legal Opinion
Bouyer v. Fortune Insurance
Orange County Court
Decided July 7, 1987No. Case No. CO86-111Published
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
JAMES C. HAUSER, County Judge.
A prevailing party seeking attorney’s fees is entitled to an opposing party’s time sheets which includes a summary of how the hours were expended.
The plaintiff in this case prevailed on the merits and now seeks attorney’s fees from the defendant. The sole issue before the court is the amount of recovery due to the plaintiff, not whether the plaintiff is entitled to attorney’s fees.
*40The plaintiff has sought to discover defense counsel’s time sheets and summaries of hours expended in preparing the defendant’s case. Counsel for the defense has…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Baird v. KoernerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1960
- In re Fine Paper Antitrust LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
- National Labor Relations Board v. E. Bruce HarveyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1965
- In Re Grand Jury Proceedings David R. Damore. Appeal of Robert Twist, Sr., Intervenor-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1982
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.