Legal Opinion
Taylor v. Newcomb
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided April 24, 1900PublishedCited by 1 opinion
Appeal from Montcalm; Davis, J. Bill by Henrietta W. Taylor against Solomon B. New-comb, John Banfield, and another, to enjoin the removal of' manure from leased premises. From a decree dismissing the bill, complainant appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, C. J.
On the 13th of November, 1894, the defendant Newcomb conveyed to complainant a farm consisting of 80 acres in the township of Pierson, Montcalm county. On the same day a lease in the following words was given back to Newcomb:
“It is hereby contracted and agreed by and between Fred F. Taylor, of the first part, and Solomon B. New-comb, of the second part, that in consideration of one dollar and other valuable consideration, the receipt whereof is hereby confessed and acknowledged, that the said first party leases to the second party the use of the buildings, well, windmill, yard, and barnyard…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Middlebrook v. CorwinNew York Supreme Court · 1836
- Pickering v. MooreSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1893
- Gallagher v. ShipleyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1866
- Fletcher v. HerringMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1873
3Cited by1 opinion
- Gomez v. DykesArizona Supreme Court · 1961