Legal Opinion
In re the Arbitration between King Broadcasting Co. & Programs for Television, Inc.
New York Supreme Court
Decided January 9, 1963PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSaul S. Streit, J.
This is an application to direct respondents' to proceed to arbitration pursuant to agreements.
Programs for Television, Inc., one of the respondents has not opposed the motion, and as to this respondent, the motion is granted.
The respondent Fortune Factors, Inc., assignee, oppose the motion and by cross motion move to dismiss the petition, on the grounds that it is not a party to any contract providing for arbitration between it and the petitioner herein.
The sole question now presented is whether the submitted papers show that by virtue of the assignment of the rentals, which were due from…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Matter of Lehman v. OstrovskyNew York Court of Appeals · 1934
- McMullen Leavens Co., Inc. v. L.I. Van Buskirk Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1949
3Cited by2 opinions
- GMAC Commercial Credit L. L. C. v. J.C. Penney Co.New York Supreme Court · 2001
- Taylor v. British Leyland Motors, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980