Legal Opinion

Stewart v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided April 2, 1990No. CR 89-224PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

David Newbern, Justice.

Mark Randall Stewart appeals from a conviction of theft. He has raised two points of appeal. He contends the evidence was not sufficient to permit his conviction under Ark. Code Ann. § 5-36-103 because proof that the car he allegedly stole was worth $2500 or more was lacking. He also argues that the court erred in refusing to instruct the jury with respect to a lesser included offense, that is, theft of property worth more than $200 but less than $2500, which carries a lesser sentencing range. We hold that the evidence was sufficient to support the conviction and that…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Doby v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1986
  2. Tillman v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1980
  3. Moore v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1989
  4. Ragland v. DumasSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1987
  5. Young v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1984

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Ayers v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
  2. Coley v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1990
  3. Sullivan v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1990
  4. Reed v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003
  5. Nichols v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2000

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API