Stewart v. State
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
David Newbern, Justice.
Mark Randall Stewart appeals from a conviction of theft. He has raised two points of appeal. He contends the evidence was not sufficient to permit his conviction under Ark. Code Ann. § 5-36-103 because proof that the car he allegedly stole was worth $2500 or more was lacking. He also argues that the court erred in refusing to instruct the jury with respect to a lesser included offense, that is, theft of property worth more than $200 but less than $2500, which carries a lesser sentencing range. We hold that the evidence was sufficient to support the conviction and that…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Doby v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1986
- Tillman v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1980
- Moore v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1989
- Ragland v. DumasSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1987
- Young v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1984
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Ayers v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
- Coley v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1990
- Sullivan v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1990
- Reed v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003
- Nichols v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2000
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.