Legal Opinion

State v. Smith

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided April 18, 1936PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFlynn, C. J.

This is an indictment which, charges that the defendants conspired together between certain dates to steal the property of the National & Providence Worsted Mills, a Rhode Island corporation. In the superior court, the defendants Anderton and Goldberg filed demurrers and motions to quash the indictment on the ground that the law under which said indictment was drawn is unconstitutional.

The trial justice, upon motion of the defendants and pursuant to the provision of section 1, chapter 348, of the general laws 1923, certified the question thus raised to be determined by this court. This…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Williamson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  2. People v. BogdanoffNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
  3. Caldwell v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  4. Lanasa v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1909
  5. Commonwealth v. HarringtonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1880

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. State v. GilmanSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1972
  2. Planned Environments Management Corp. v. RobertSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2009
  3. State v. LernerSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1973
  4. State v. LevittSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1977
  5. State v. BriggsSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2001

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API