Legal Opinion

Gentile Bros. v. Bryan

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided April 15, 1931PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWhitfield, P.J.

L. M. Bryan, without the concurrence ■of his wife, executed a mortgage “lien upon all citrus fruit that may be produced on trees growing upon” described lands, the homestead of the mortgagor. The mortgage contains a personal covenant that Bryan “will at all times cultivate, spray for control of pests and diseases, and in all ways diligently care for and protect the citrus trees and the fruit growing thereon”; and the mortgage lien is to secure payment for “cash advances made, supplies furnished and services rendered” by the mortgagee, who agreed “to furnish for use on the trees such…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. McClusky v. TrusselMississippi Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Richbourg v. RoseSupreme Court of Florida · 1907
  3. Vulicevich v. SkinnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Purner v. PiercyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1874
  5. Summerlin v. Orange Shores, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1929

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Graves Bros. Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1952
  2. Haines City Citrus Growers Assn. v. PettewaySupreme Court of Florida · 1932
  3. Owen v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1951
  4. Adams v. AdamsSupreme Court of Florida · 1946
  5. Plant City Agricultural Credit Co. v. PoolSupreme Court of Florida · 1931

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API