Legal Opinion

Miller v. Estep

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 30, 1928No. 508Published

1Opinion of the CourtHickman, C. J.

The plaintiff in error will be called plaintiff and the defendants in error will be called defendants. Plaintiff brought suit against R. J. Estep & Co.,, contractors, and the city of Abilene, for damages for personal injuries alleged to have been sustained by her by reason of the negligence of the defendants in refilling a sewer ditch and failing to restore the surface of the alley through which the ditch was dug to the same condition as it was before the excavation was made. The case was submitted to the jury on special issues, which, together with the answers thereto, were as follows:

“Specia…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hart v. Northern Pac. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1912
  2. French v. SabinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909
  3. Fowler v. Georgia Railroad & Banking Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1909
  4. Koepcke v. Wisconsin Bridge & Iron Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1902
  5. Higgins v. Los Angeles Railway Co.California Court of Appeal · 1907

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API