Legal Opinion

Didier v. Woodward

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 8, 1921No. 1783PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Lynn County; W. R. Spencer, Judge. Suit by J. J. Didier against Mrs. Louise Didier McDonald Woodward, and her husband, who instituted a cross-action against plaintiff, and made certain heirs parties thereto. Judgment for named defendant, and plaintiff and others appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtHall, J.

Originally this was a partition suit, filed by appellant against Mrs. Wood- • ward, claiming three-sevenths of a certain section of land described in his petition, and alleging that the remaining four-sevenths belonged to Mrs. Woodward. The appellee joined by her husband, answered, denying that appellant owned any interest in the land, and by way of cross-action sued all the heirs of Henry Didier, deceased, for the entire section, pleading .the 10-year statute of limitations. The appellant replied to appellee’s cross-action, amending his petition, and asserted ownership of a seven-sixteenth…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hughes v. LaneTexas Supreme Court · 1860
  2. Green v. BoonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1896
  3. Thomas v. PorterTexas Supreme Court · 1882

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Hardin v. HardinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1927
  2. Vaughan v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1973
  3. McAnally v. Texas Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1930
  4. Smith v. BradshawCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1936
  5. Niemann v. GarciaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1940

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API