Legal Opinion

Claim of Lampert v. Siemons

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 15, 1922PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hinman, J.:

Sigmund Lampert was foreman of the operating department of a shirt waist manufacturer, whose employees were out on a strike. Being foreman he was not a member of the union, and among others he continued in the employment during the strike. He testifies that when the strike occurred, he went to Mr. Siemons, the employer, and expressed some fear as to his personal safety if he kept working, to which he says the employer replied, “ Don’t be afraid, I will protect you.” The employer testifies: “ We had a discussion about his safety, but we didn’t come to any really definite conclusion…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Claim of Littler v. George A. Fuller Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1918
  2. Claim of Mason v. SchefferAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Enterprise Foundry Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
  2. E. Clemens Horst Co. v. Hartford Accident & Idemnity Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1928
  3. Enterprise Foundry Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API