Brooks v. State

RAMEY, Chief Justice.

The Appellant, James Brooks (“Brooks”), appeals his conviction for engaging in organized criminal activity. Following a plea of “not guilty,” Brooks was tried before a jury, which found him guilty of the offense charged and assessed his punishment at life imprisonment and a ten thousand dollar fine. We will affirm the conviction.

Brooks’ first point of error asserts that the evidence was insufficient to support the verdict. The standard for reviewing the sufficiency of the evidence is whether, after reviewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any…