Snell v. Asbury
District Court, W.D. Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
CAUTHRON, District Judge.
Before the Court is the Opinion by the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals regarding the defendants’ interlocutory appeal on the issues of absolute and qualified immunity. Snell v. Tunnell, 920 F.2d 673 (10th Cir.1990), cert. denied sub nom., — U.S. -, 111 S.Ct. 1622, 113 L.Ed.2d 719 (1991). The District Court’s published Order of October 28, 1988, was affirmed and the case was remanded for trial. Snell v. Tunnell, 698 F.Supp. 1542 (W.D.Okla.1988) (Phillips, J.). The mandate on the Tenth Circuit’s opinion was issued January 22, 1991.
In its October 28, 1988 Order, the…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Quern v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Dennis v. SparksSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Copperweld Corp. v. Independence Tube Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Babakr v. GoerdelDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2021