Legal Opinion

Fuhrman & Forster Co. v. Commissioner

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided July 22, 1940No. 7172PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KERNER, Circuit Judge.

Fuhrman & Forster Company (petitioner) filed a refund claim for sums alleged to have been paid as processing taxes under the Agricultural Adjustment Act, 48 Stat. 31, 7 U.S.C.A. § 601 et seq. The Commissioner of Internal Revenue rejected the claim on the ground that the amount sought to be recovered had not been paid by or collected from the petitioner under the Agricultural Adjustment Act. Petitioner then sought review of the disallowance in the United States Processing Tax Board of Review. There, upon motion of the Commissioner, the Board dismissed the petition for…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. ButlerSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
  2. Oswald Jaeger Baking Co. v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1939
  3. F. & F. LABORATORIES v. Commissioner of Internal Rev.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1939
  4. Arabi Packing Co. v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1940

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. International Tape Manufacturers Ass'n v. GersteinDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1972
  2. Alexander Smith & Sons Carpet Co. v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1941
  3. Lindner Packing & Provision Co. v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1941
  4. Savannah Sugar Refining Corp. v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1941
  5. Albert Miller & Co. v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1941

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API