Legal Opinion

Office Specialty Manuf'g Co. v. Globe Co.

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern Ohio

Decided January 21, 1895No. 4,607PublishedCited by 4 opinions

This was a hill by the Office Specialty Manufacturing Company against the Globe Company for infringement of a patent.

1Opinion of the Court

SAGE, District Judge.

The patent for the infringement of which this suit is brought was issued to James S. Shannon on the 29 th of July, 1879 (Ho. 217,907), for an improvement in that class of temporary hinders which have fixed receiving wires and transfer or vibrating wires. The improvement consists — First, in giving movement to the transfer wires on a vertical axis, for the purpose of swinging their free ends towards or from the free ends of the fixed wires; secondly, in means provided and' arranged whereby the transfer wires are held stationary, either in contact with or removed from the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. O'Reilly v. MorseSupreme Court of the United States · 1854
  2. Miller v. Brass Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1882
  3. Sessions v. RomadkaSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  4. Seymour v. McCormickSupreme Court of the United States · 1857
  5. Singer v. WalmsleyU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Maryland · 1860

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. DebsU.S. Circuit Court for the Northern District of Illnois · 1894
  2. Office Specialty Manuf'g Co. v. Winternight & Cornyn Manuf'g Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania · 1895
  3. Ensten v. Rich-Sampliner Co.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1926
  4. Comptograph Co. v. Mechanical Accountant Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Rhode Island · 1904

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API