Legal Opinion

Robinson & Wells, P.C. v. Warren

Utah Supreme Court

Decided July 28, 1983No. 18413PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OAKS, Justice:

The district court confirmed the award of an arbitrator in a controversy between a professional corporation and a client over legal fees. The client’s appeal seeks a remand to determine whether the fees met the standard of “reasonableness” specified in the Code of Professional Responsibility, a question not considered by the arbitrator. At issue are the meaning of provisions of the Arbitration Act, U.C.A., 1953, §§ 78-31-1 to -22, and the procedures to be followed in confirming awards under it.

So far as pertinent to this controversy, the written retainer agreement provided that…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Herro, McAndrews & Porter, S. C. v. GerhardtWisconsin Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Kiser v. MillerDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1973
  3. Lindon City v. Engineers Construction Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Schroud v. Van C. Argiris & Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1979
  5. Giannopulos v. PappasUtah Supreme Court · 1932

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Central Florida Investments, Inc. v. Parkwest AssociatesUtah Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Hamm v. Millennium Income Fund, L.L.C., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2005
  3. Buzas Baseball, Inc. v. Salt Lake Trappers, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Chandler v. Blue Cross Blue Shield of UtahUtah Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Anne Arundel County v. Fraternal Order of Anne Arundel Detention Officers & PersonnelCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1988

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API