Robinson & Wells, P.C. v. Warren
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OAKS, Justice:
The district court confirmed the award of an arbitrator in a controversy between a professional corporation and a client over legal fees. The client’s appeal seeks a remand to determine whether the fees met the standard of “reasonableness” specified in the Code of Professional Responsibility, a question not considered by the arbitrator. At issue are the meaning of provisions of the Arbitration Act, U.C.A., 1953, §§ 78-31-1 to -22, and the procedures to be followed in confirming awards under it.
So far as pertinent to this controversy, the written retainer agreement provided that…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Herro, McAndrews & Porter, S. C. v. GerhardtWisconsin Supreme Court · 1974
- Kiser v. MillerDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1973
- Lindon City v. Engineers Construction Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1981
- Schroud v. Van C. Argiris & Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1979
- Giannopulos v. PappasUtah Supreme Court · 1932
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Central Florida Investments, Inc. v. Parkwest AssociatesUtah Supreme Court · 2002
- Hamm v. Millennium Income Fund, L.L.C., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2005
- Buzas Baseball, Inc. v. Salt Lake Trappers, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1996
- Chandler v. Blue Cross Blue Shield of UtahUtah Supreme Court · 1992
- Anne Arundel County v. Fraternal Order of Anne Arundel Detention Officers & PersonnelCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1988
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.