Legal Opinion
Herbst v. Asiatic Prince
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided October 18, 1899PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BROWN, District Judge.
This libel was filed to recover $35,750 damages for the alleged nondelivery as per bills of lading of a consignment of merchandise invoiced at £6449.11.3, consisting of flour, lard, bacon and kerosene and shipped by the libelant on the steamer Asiatic Prince about December 31, 1895, “by order and for the account and risk of Belmareo & Co.,” merchants, at Santos, Brazil, to whom the goods were invoiced and consigned.
Three bills of lading were issued to the libelant for the goods, reciting that they were marked “B. & C.” and deliverable to order at Santos. The steamer…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Constable v. National Steamship Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Maryland Insurance v. Ruden's AdministratorSupreme Court of the United States · 1810
- Hard v. The EnchantressCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1894
- Hard v. The EnchantressDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1893
3Cited by9 opinions
- Tan Hi v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1950
- Munson v. Straits of Dover S. S. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1900
- Latham B. Hewlett v. Barge Bertie, in Rem, Tug Evelyn, Her Engines, Etc., in Rem, and C. G. Willis Co., Inc., in PersonamCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1969
- Banik v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1920
- The Milwaukee BridgeDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1926
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.