Legal Opinion
Owens v. Sullivan
District Court, E.D. Arkansas
Decided July 18, 1991No. LR-C-90-233PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
EISELE, Senior District Judge.
Defendant’s motion for summary judgment is before the Court. Plaintiffs responded to the motion and seek summary judgment in their favor. This is a Social Security case where plaintiffs seek reimbursement for retirement benefits deducted by the Secretary of Health and Human Services. For the reasons discussed below, the Court will grant the motion in favor of the Secretary.
The issue before the Court is whether there is substantial evidence in the record to support the Secretary’s determination that plaintiffs were not entitled to benefits for a three-year…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Paula Constr. Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1972
- Hazel M. SYKES, Appellant, v. Otis R. BOWEN, M.D., Secretary of Health and Human Services, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1988
- Dorothy J. KIRBY, Appellant, v. Louis W. SULLIVAN, M.D., Secretary of Health and Human Services, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1991
- Spicer Accounting, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Bramlette Bldg. Corp. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1969
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Johnson v. ChaterCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997
- John F. Johnson v. Shirley S. ChaterCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997
- Pointer v. ShalalaDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1993