Legal Opinion
Hoagland v. Finholt
Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)
Decided June 21, 1989No. 05-87-00128-CVPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HOWELL, Justice.
This suit arises from a mutual endeavor of plaintiff Roger Finholt and defendant Jerry Hoagland to acquire a ninety-six-acre tract of land and develop a mobile home park. The parties either formed or attempted to form a limited partnership for this purpose. In a declaratory judgment action by the putative general partner, Roger Finholt (GP), against the putative limited partner, Jerry Hoagland (LP), the trial court held that no limited partnership was ever formed in accordance with applicable law. 1 From this premise, the court went on to hold that all of the assets of the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Nixon v. Mr. Property Management Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
- City of Houston v. Clear Creek Basin AuthorityTexas Supreme Court · 1979
- Montgomery v. KennedyTexas Supreme Court · 1984
- El Chico Corp. v. PooleTexas Supreme Court · 1987
- Sabine Pilot Service, Inc. v. HauckTexas Supreme Court · 1985
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- McLernon v. Dynegy, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2011
- McLendon v. McLendon, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1993
- Parker County's Squaw Creek Downs, L.P. AND James R. Dunnagan v. Joseph Earl Watson, Larry C. Lawley, and James R. Dunnagan AND Joseph Earl Watson, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2009
- Westfield Development, Inc. v. Boris Rubashkin and Larisa Rubashkin, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2007
- in Re James R. Dunnagan, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2009
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.