Grigsby v. Caruth
Texas Supreme Court
Appeal from Dallas. Tried below before A. S. Lathrop, special judge. The opinion, states sufficiently the case. The brief in support of the motion for rehearing has not reached the reporter.
1Opinion of the Court
Bonner, Associate Justice.
This is a branch of the same case decided on a previous day of the term — William Caruth v. D. B. Grigsby et al., No. 4554, infra, and that case is referred to for a full statement of the respective titles and issues relied upon by the parties.
The suit below resulted in a judgment in favor of one of the plaintiffs, Maria Louisa Swindle, and against the other plaintiff, Daniel B. Grigsby, who is- the appellant here — William Caruth, the appellant in that case, being the appellee now.
The court in the charge to the jury, as to both plaintiffs, held that the partition…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Boggs v. Merced Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1859
- Scoby v. SweattTexas Supreme Court · 1866
- Millican v. MillicanTexas Supreme Court · 1859
- Page v. ArnimTexas Supreme Court · 1867
3Cited by3 opinions
- Grigsby v. PeakTexas Supreme Court · 1887
- Oliver v. HuckinsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1922
- Oliver v. HuckinsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1922