Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Gordon

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 27, 2003No. 01-1679-CRPublished

1Dissent

SHIRLEY S. ABRAHAMSON, CHIEF JUSTICE

¶ 44. (dissenting). The defendant pled not guilty to *404three counts and asked for a jury trial. During trial, defense counsel conceded the defendant's guilt to one of the counts — disorderly conduct while armed with a dangerous weapon — and failed to object to jury instructions that omitted an element of this crime.1 The mere statement of these simple, undisputed facts illustrates the flaws in the majority decision.

¶ 45. The Constitution provides that the decision to plead guilty rests with the defendant alone. The due process clause of the Fourteenth…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API