Legal Opinion

Investment Contracts, Inc. v. Jones

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided December 22, 1969No. 7814PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

SARTAIN, Judge.

Plaintiff, by confirmation of default, obtained a judgment against defendants. When plaintiff commenced garnishment proceedings to collect on the judgment, defendants instituted this present action to have the original judgment set aside on the grounds that it was obtained through fraud and ill practice on the part of plaintiffs’ attorney.

The trial judge held that defendants had failed to prove that the judgment against them was obtained by fraud and refused to set it aside. Defendants now appeal from this adverse judgment..The pertinent facts giving rise to the instant…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Vinson v. PicoloLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1943
  2. XL Finance Company v. FenskeLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1967
  3. Dixson v. CarterLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1962
  4. Home Finance Service Washington Parish v. TaylorLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1966
  5. Carpenter v. X-L Finance Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1967

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Johnson v. Jones-JournetLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API