Legal Opinion

United States v. Hanhardt

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided July 11, 2001No. 00 CR 0853PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

NORGLE, District Judge.

Before the court is the motion of Defendant Joseph Basinski to suppress evidence obtained from a search of his briefcase. This evidence was previously suppressed in a case involving alleged witness retaliation and obstruction of justice because the Government searched the briefcase without a warrant. See United States v. Basinski, 226 F.3d 829, 833-39 (7th Cir.2000). Since then, the Government has obtained a search warrant, re-searched the briefcase, and indicated its intent to offer the same evidence against Basinski in the case at bar. For the…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Ashe v. SwensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Nix v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Silverthorne Lumber Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  5. Murray v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. v. Dominguez-CastorColorado Court of Appeals · 2020
  2. v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 2021
  3. The PEOPLE of the State of Colorado v. Asha Adolphus THOMPSONSupreme Court of Colorado · 2021
  4. State v. MilesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011
  5. State v. MilesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API