Succession of Richardson
Supreme Court of Louisiana
Appeal from th:- Parish Court, parish of East Feliciana. Haralson,, J.
1Opinion of the CourtWxLt, J.
The motion to dismiss this appeal because the opponents, who are the appellants, have not given bond, must prevail. The only bond we find in the record is subscribed by M. McQueen, as principal, and Charles B. Austin, as security.
It is not necessary that the appellant should sign the appeal bond; but an appeal granted to Elizabeth McQueen and others can not be perfected by an appeal bond signed by M. McQueen, as principal, and Charles B. Austin, as security. The surety of M. McQueen can not be regarded as the surety of Elizabeth McQueen.
It is therefore ordered that the appeal herein be…
2Cited by4 opinions
- Braun v. VeillonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1928
- Government Employees Insurance v. ThompsonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1977
- United Railway Men's Oil Ass'n v. DupuySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1927
- Braun v. VeillonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1928