Brooke v. Filer
Indiana Supreme Court
APPEAL from the Marshall Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtPettit, J.
It is proper to state that David G. Rose was • originally one of the defendants in this suit, and that during its progress his death was suggested, and Filer and wife, being'his'heirs, were made defendants in his stead.
This was a suit brought to review the proceedings and judgment in a former suit in said court, under the statute, 2 iG. & H. 279. The original suit was commenced on the 14th 'day of May, 1861, and final judgment was rendered on the 21st day of August, 1863, and this suit for review was com-menced April 19th, 1866, less than three years afterthe ren- • dition of the original…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- United States v. GrossmayerSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
- Perkins v. RogersIndiana Supreme Court · 1871
- Kanawha Coal Co. v. Kanawha & O. Coal Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1870
- Knœfel v. WilliamsIndiana Supreme Court · 1868
3Cited by3 opinions
- Early v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1876
- State v. MainSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1962
- State v. MainSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1962