Legal Opinion
Conneen v. Speedy Muffler King, Inc.
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided November 30, 1989No. Nos. 655 and 656 C.D. 1989Published
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BARRY, Judge.
The Township of Springfield (Township), its Board of Commissioners and its Director of Code Enforcement, Richard Conneen appeal two orders of the Court of Common Pleas of Delaware County, which permitted Bloor Automotive, Inc. (Bloor), the successor in title to Speedy Muffler King, Inc., to use a structure as a non-conforming use.
In 1984, Speedy Muffler King, Inc. (Speedy) sought a dimensional variance from the Township’s Zoning Hearing Board (Board) to construct a building to house its automobile related business. The Board granted the variance and various objectors…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Silverco, Inc. v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
- Cheltenham Township AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
- Riccardi v. Plymouth Township Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
- Calabrese v. Zoning Board of Adjustment & SchneiderCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
- Roth v. Zoning Hearing BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.