Legal Opinion

George A. Nunley v. State of Indiana

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided December 18, 2013No. 10A04-1212-CR-630PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ROBB, Chief Judge.

The State has petitioned this court for rehearing of our decision dated October 2, 2013. In our opinion we held, in relevant part, that the trial court erred in allowing the State to amend the habitual offender allegation after the jury was empaneled. Nunley v. State, 995 N.E.2d 718, 726 (Ind.Ct.App.2013). We concluded that the amendment was made after the commencement of trial and that it prejudiced Nunley’s substantial rights and therefore was not allowed under any subsection of Indiana Code section 35-34-1-5, which deals with amendments to an information.…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Monge v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  2. Jaramillo v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2005
  3. White v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2012
  4. Geroge A. Nunley v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2013

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Eric P. Wheeler v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2018
  2. Anthony Steven Williams, Jr. v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2019
  3. Bryan C. Ellis v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2018
  4. Howard Wilder v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2015
  5. Robert Wayne Dilden III v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API