Legal Opinion

(PC) Ardds v. Hicks

District Court, E.D. California

Decided August 6, 2021No. 1:19-cv-01738Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ANTOINE L. ARDDS, ) Case No.: 1:19-cv-01738-SAB (PC) ) 12 Plaintiff, ) ) ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S 13 v. ) MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, AND DISMISSING ACTION, WITHOUT 14 D. HICKS, ) PREJUDICE ) 15 Defendant. ) (ECF No. 55) ) 16 ) 17 Plaintiff Antoine L. Ardds is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action 18 pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Both parties consented to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction pursuant to 28 19 U.S.C. § 636(c)(1). (ECF No. 39.) 20 Currently before the Court is…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Jones v. BockSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Woodford v. NgoSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  3. Ross v. BlakeSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
  4. Booth v. ChurnerSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  5. Juan Albino v. Lee BacaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API